Message Forums

Quote: Originally posted by Billy x on 25/4/2015

---

Only place left to go is Supreme court here. I do hope he is not having to pay his own costs.

---

Quote: Parking Eye have recently been in the Court of Appeal - in a few weeks there will be a Judgment.

---

---

Quote: Originally posted by nelmo on 27/4/2015

---

Quote: Parking Eye have recently been in the Court of Appeal - in a few weeks there will be a Judgment.

---

---

I have been taken to a small claims court by PE. My case was last week - the decision was 'stayed' (postponed) pending this appeal case.

---

I dare say that round about now your Court will have been advised of the Beavis case and that ParkingEye will have asked for directions as to how your case should proceed to appeal.

Phil.

Quote: Originally posted by cwdc56768 on 02/5/2015

Quote: Originally posted by nelmo on 27/4/2015

Quote: Parking Eye have recently been in the Court of Appeal - in a few weeks there will be a Judgment.

---

I have been taken to a small claims court by PE. My case was last week - the decision was 'stayed' (postponed) pending this appeal case.

I dare say that round about now your Court will have been advised of the Beavis case and that ParkingEye will have asked for directions as to how your case should proceed to appeal.

 

 

Phil.

---

Quote: Originally posted by iank01 on 03/5/2015

---

This is being appealled in the Supreme court and until the Supreme court rules we will continue to gnore any tickets PE are stupid enough to issue.

---

For any of you familar with the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Regulations 2014 ParkingEye's claims for those who parked before October 2014, but for which ParkingEye want you to pay after October 2014 on the basis of the Beavis decision, are prohibited by law.

Phil

Quote: Originally posted by mikegalagher on 03/5/2015

---

Quote: Originally posted by iank01 on 03/5/2015This is being appealled in the Supreme court and until the Supreme court rules we will continue to gnore any tickets PE are stupid enough to issue.

---

---

Well, good luck with that. Personally I check the rules and abide by them. That way it's not an issue.

---

Quote: Originally posted by iank01

---

Why should any one pay their excessive charges which are higher than a council? They do not own the land and do not maintain the land. In addition, shouldn't all their invoices have a VAT number as surely they earn over the threshold? I can see HMRC being very interested in this case as they can back date VAT to day one and also fine the company a huge amount of money. BTW isn't PE owned by Capita?

---