|
Topic: Fuel Consumption while Towing
|
Page: 1 2
 |
10/7/2024 at 5:50pm
Location: London Outfit: Lunar Cosmos 524
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 17/9/2015 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 2540
Site Reviews Total: | 1 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 1 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 6 |
|
Probably depends on what the re-map prioritised - more power, different peak power/torque points, power band characteristics, etc. etc.! Some people like their driving to be sedate and have torque at low revs do the work, whilst others are wannabe racers and love all the power at near red line revs! The standard map for the car will have been heavily biased to economy/low emissions at the standard test figure/speeds used to assess the car's rating for economy and emissions used to judge it against the competition and for taxation bands.
It may have shifted the sweet spots for economy away from engine speed at normal towing speeds. It may have shifted those sweet spots in terms of any particular gear, so you may need a lower gear to climb hills than before, or vice versa, you may be dropping a gear when you no longer need to!
I've got friends who remap their engines regularly on their track day cars (they DIY trackside with reprogrammable ECUs and a laptop), it's not about economy with them, it's about matching power bands, peak power/torque to track speed/gears on any particular track. But the principle remains the same for a road car, maybe your re-map is not best suited to towing. It's a complicated business and a little bit of a black art, friends apply a lot of technical theory to it, but sometimes a bit of trial and error triumphs over all!
It's difficult to say whether a re-map can be done to better towing performance/economy or not, that's best for experts to discuss. As to whether you should go back to the original map, that rather depends on why you had it re-mapped in the first place, you've got to balance your towing miles (and reduced economy) against solo driving miles and whether the re-map enhances that in any way.
|
10/7/2024 at 6:31pm
Location: Aberdeenshire Outfit: Coachman+Highlander
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 24/8/2023 Standard Member
Forum Posts: 45
Site Reviews Total: | 6 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 4 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 14 |
Site Nights 2023: | 9 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
|
Quote: Originally posted by Monty15 on 10/7/2024
Probably depends on what the re-map prioritised - more power, different peak power/torque points, power band characteristics, etc. etc.! Some people like their driving to be sedate and have torque at low revs do the work, whilst others are wannabe racers and love all the power at near red line revs! The standard map for the car will have been heavily biased to economy/low emissions at the standard test figure/speeds used to assess the car's rating for economy and emissions used to judge it against the competition and for taxation bands.
It may have shifted the sweet spots for economy away from engine speed at normal towing speeds. It may have shifted those sweet spots in terms of any particular gear, so you may need a lower gear to climb hills than before, or vice versa, you may be dropping a gear when you no longer need to!
I've got friends who remap their engines regularly on their track day cars (they DIY trackside with reprogrammable ECUs and a laptop), it's not about economy with them, it's about matching power bands, peak power/torque to track speed/gears on any particular track. But the principle remains the same for a road car, maybe your re-map is not best suited to towing. It's a complicated business and a little bit of a black art, friends apply a lot of technical theory to it, but sometimes a bit of trial and error triumphs over all!
It's difficult to say whether a re-map can be done to better towing performance/economy or not, that's best for experts to discuss. As to whether you should go back to the original map, that rather depends on why you had it re-mapped in the first place, you've got to balance your towing miles (and reduced economy) against solo driving miles and whether the re-map enhances that in any way.
WOW! Thanks very much for that indepth explanation.
I'm just over 80 yrs and so no longer a "boy" racer, when I was, it was a case of skimming the head or fitting twin delertos or similar there was no ECU!
A friend told me that if I had a remap I would know a huge difference whilst towing, I wouldn't say huge, but I did see a difference in that I could go up a hill in a higher gear. My main objective was increased power with fuel economy, so really "sedate driving" as you've pointed out. So if I've read your post correct I want more power at lower revs whereas what I've got is more power at higher revs. The garage told me to go as high as 3000 rpm before it kicks in whereas prior to remap the power kicked in at 1500 rpm.
Once again thanks very much for the enlightenment!
------------- 2011+Coachman+Highlander+450%2F2%2C+towcar+2018+Renault+Kadjar+Signature+Nav+1%2E6dci+130bhp+4WD
|
10/7/2024 at 7:04pm
Location: Essex Outfit: Lunar Delta TS 2017
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 20/8/2004 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 2543
Site Reviews Total: | 15 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 1 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 12 |
Site Nights 2023: | 5 |
Site Nights 2022: | 14 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
|
How are you measuring your mpg?
Don’t rely on the cars on board computer
------------- Claire and Colin
|
11/7/2024 at 11:21am
Location: East Herts Outfit: 1992 Elddis Wisp 450CT + X Trail
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 05/11/2013 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 6379
Site Reviews Total: | 18 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 1 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 1 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 2 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 7 |
Site Nights 2023: | 8 |
Site Nights 2022: | 12 |
Site Nights 2021: | 18 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 21 |
|
One of the things I like with my outfit is that there is no noticeable difference in fuel consumption whether the caravan is on the back or not. I have sometimes thought about having the car remapped, but then I've thought better of it. There are so many different options, so what would I go for?
I have often wondered how anyone would know if their car had already been remapped? In my boy-racer days most of my cars were got-at in some way. Twin-carbs, free-flow manifolds, skimmed heads etc, but these were all obvious. These days unless there are stickers to the effect that a mod has been done, you simply can't tell. I always had a feeling that my last car, a 2007 Hyundai Tucson automatic, had been got-at in some way as it seemed to be much quicker off the mark than standard ones, and it was all too easy to spin the wheels when pulling away quickly. I have a roundabout right near me which is a nightmare! The traffic comes round it in a fast continuous stream, so you take your life in your hands getting out of the turning from my village, and that Tucson nearly always spun its wheels pulling out of there.
------------- Best Regards,
Colin
|
11/7/2024 at 12:31pm
Location: Aberdeenshire Outfit: Coachman+Highlander
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 24/8/2023 Standard Member
Forum Posts: 45
Site Reviews Total: | 6 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 4 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 14 |
Site Nights 2023: | 9 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
|
Quote: Originally posted by Colin21 on 11/7/2024
One of the things I like with my outfit is that there is no noticeable difference in fuel consumption whether the caravan is on the back or not. I have sometimes thought about having the car remapped, but then I've thought better of it. There are so many different options, so what would I go for?
I have often wondered how anyone would know if their car had already been remapped? In my boy-racer days most of my cars were got-at in some way. Twin-carbs, free-flow manifolds, skimmed heads etc, but these were all obvious. These days unless there are stickers to the effect that a mod has been done, you simply can't tell. I always had a feeling that my last car, a 2007 Hyundai Tucson automatic, had been got-at in some way as it seemed to be much quicker off the mark than standard ones, and it was all too easy to spin the wheels when pulling away quickly. I have a roundabout right near me which is a nightmare! The traffic comes round it in a fast continuous stream, so you take your life in your hands getting out of the turning from my village, and that Tucson nearly always spun its wheels pulling out of there.
You are lucky if there is no appreciable change in consumption, your outfit is obviously well matched. In my case the original was 53.8mpg without caravan and 36mpg with it, quite a drop. And I know the car was never modified because I got it straight from the factory, but that's a different story.
With the remap the consumption dropped to 25mpg pulling the caravan, I'm not sure what it is without the van. I should add I'm speaking North of Scotland roads which leave a lot to be desired.
------------- 2011+Coachman+Highlander+450%2F2%2C+towcar+2018+Renault+Kadjar+Signature+Nav+1%2E6dci+130bhp+4WD
|
11/7/2024 at 12:53pm
Location: Outfit:
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 05/7/2006 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 5547 Tent Reviews: 1
Site Reviews Total: | 13 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
|
Quote: Originally posted by Grayhair on 11/7/2024
I'm using the Renault Rlink 2 system, which I guess is linked to the on-board computer.
So why do you say not to rely on it, isn't it accurate?
I keep a spreadsheet on which I record mileage and fuel purchased. This gives me accurate current and long term fuel consumption, and there is always a difference from the figure shown on the on-board computer.
------------- Bernie
|
11/7/2024 at 1:00pm
Location: East Herts Outfit: 1992 Elddis Wisp 450CT + X Trail
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 05/11/2013 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 6379
Site Reviews Total: | 18 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 1 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 1 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 2 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 7 |
Site Nights 2023: | 8 |
Site Nights 2022: | 12 |
Site Nights 2021: | 18 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 21 |
|
Quote: Originally posted by Grayhair on 11/7/2024
Quote: Originally posted by Colin21 on 11/7/2024
One of the things I like with my outfit is that there is no noticeable difference in fuel consumption whether the caravan is on the back or not. I have sometimes thought about having the car remapped, but then I've thought better of it. There are so many different options, so what would I go for?
You are lucky if there is no appreciable change in consumption, your outfit is obviously well matched. In my case the original was 53.8mpg without caravan and 36mpg with it, quite a drop. And I know the car was never modified because I got it straight from the factory, but that's a different story.
With the remap the consumption dropped to 25mpg pulling the caravan, I'm not sure what it is without the van. I should add I'm speaking North of Scotland roads which leave a lot to be desired.
I drive a 2 litre diesel X Trail which is now 16 years old, and it does on average about 35 mpg. I really don't notice any difference with the caravan on the back, but then the caravan only weighs about a ton. The manual version of my car has a 2 ton towing limit, although my auto is limited to 1350kg. I think that's down to the gearbox though as the car is otherwise identical to the manual version. Consequently I hardly know our caravan is on the back. I have just done a 200 mile journey towing the caravan and I didn't put any more fuel in than I would have done with just the car.
We are much further south than you though. That recent tow was from home in Hertfordshire, where the roads are fairly good apart from the many pot-holes, up to Lincolnshire where the roads are fairly flat but much twistier than back home. Hardly a 300 yard stretch of straight road at any point, so constantly slowing down and speeding up again.
------------- Best Regards,
Colin
|
11/7/2024 at 1:29pm
Location: London Outfit: Lunar Cosmos 524
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 17/9/2015 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 2540
Site Reviews Total: | 1 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 1 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 6 |
|
Your drop from 53.8 solo to 36 towing is IMHO pretty close to normal, if a tad on the good side!
As a rough guide doubling the fuel consumption when towing is a pretty good rule of thumb it seems, but when you think about it, it makes a sort of sense, most folk near double the weight of their car when hitching a caravan, and the caravan is a large brick in terms of aerodynamics!
Your current 26mpg towing is pretty poor though, I better that with my Petrol (manual gearbox) car on a really bad journey (hilly, lots of stop-starts, roundabouts, pootling through towns etc.) at around 28mpg, but a good cruising on motorway journey, I regularly achieve 35mpg average. With my van I'm almost on the limit of car's towing capacity of 1350Kg, so it's no easy tow for the car.
As to accuracy of mpg figures, my onboard computer - linked phone app (Citroen) is a little optimistic compared to good old fashioned fuel used/milage covered calculations, it depends on the journey, but maybe 5 to 7% optimistic error compared with irrefutable fuel used/refill and milage covered.
|
11/7/2024 at 1:45pm
Location: East Herts Outfit: 1992 Elddis Wisp 450CT + X Trail
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 05/11/2013 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 6379
Site Reviews Total: | 18 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 1 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 1 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 2 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 7 |
Site Nights 2023: | 8 |
Site Nights 2022: | 12 |
Site Nights 2021: | 18 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 21 |
|
All my fuel consumption figures are done the old fashioned way as my car is old and I wouldn't trust my onboard computer. It is often miles out, stuck on 30.1 mpg sometimes for weeks. My calculations tell me it's doing much better than that.
Although my caravan is very light by modern standards it has the same frontal area as a big twin-axle van, and wind drag does have a big impact. However, my car itself is rather brick-like and quite high so I think a lot of the air-flow goes over the caravan roof. A lower, less powerful car than mine towing the same caravan would probably notice a much bigger difference than I do.
------------- Best Regards,
Colin
|
11/7/2024 at 2:32pm
Location: London Outfit: Lunar Cosmos 524
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 17/9/2015 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 2540
Site Reviews Total: | 1 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 1 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 6 |
|
Quote: Originally posted by Colin21 on 11/7/2024
....
..... However, my car itself is rather brick-like and quite high so I think a lot of the air-flow goes over the caravan roof. A lower, less powerful car than mine towing the same caravan would probably notice a much bigger difference than I do.
Likewise, my car is high roofed and square backed (minimal gap between car and van), I think it makes for a very aerodynamic combination with the caravan. The lack of bug splatter on the front of my van (a little at start of roof is as bad as it ever gets) suggests the airflow over the car just carries on over the van, which may explain both the good fuel consumption and the exceptionally good handling.
|
11/7/2024 at 7:25pm
Location: West country Outfit: Mondeo
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 23/8/2008 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 4692
Site Reviews Total: | 1 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
|
An engine is most efficient when the engine speed is at the maximum torque engine speed. For my 1.6 Pug diesel that's at 1500 RPM which is 40 mph in 5th (top) gear and 30mph in 4th.
|
12/7/2024 at 8:12am
Location: Essex Outfit: Lunar Delta TS 2017
View Profile
Reply
Quote
|
Joined: 20/8/2004 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 2543
Site Reviews Total: | 15 |
|
Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2024: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 1 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 2 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
Site Nights 2024: | 12 |
Site Nights 2023: | 5 |
Site Nights 2022: | 14 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
|
In reality if you tow your caravan with your current car the mpg is what it is.
Also a remap would be considered a modification, which your car insurer should be told about. Much like some companies consider a tow bar a modification, although our insurer (Admiral) doesn’t.
------------- Claire and Colin
|
|