Hi
I am a newbie here & after many years spent camping under canvas we have decided to upgrade & buy a caravan. My question is which stabiliser is better, (if any) the blade type (Bulldog, etc) or the AlKo / Winterhoff hitch stabilisers?. The blade type seem to be cheaper, does this mean they are not as good?
My outfit is a 1997 2 berth Swift Classic Silhouette, towed by a 2001 (51 reg) Ford Mondeo 1800 petrol.
I reckon , by and large, you get what you pay for. If you want the best, it will cost more. However, depends on how big the trailer. I have a 2 berth, and my Snakemaster has done well. I think I got it from Towsure.
Hi Matt, Welcome to our little soiree. I have had both types and the alko is the best. I would say that as I have a new 3004 for sale ( £90 ) but on these forums I have only had a lot of time wasters. The triple pack is £240 at Towsure, the actual stabiliser is £180 by it self so mine by itself is dirt cheap. Post if you are interested.
The Alko/winterhoff solution is easier to use and more positive since when you are hitching up it is difficult to forget to push the lever down. The blade types are more awkward to fit and genrally less convenient. They both work very well, it would be hard to say that one was better than the other in action. I used a blade for 11 years and I have used an Alko for 5 years and I would not willingly go back to a blade. However if my next van ( whenever that may be ) is not fitted with a stabilising hitch I would not be prepared to pay the extra £150+ to have one fitted when the blade type do as good a job.
I would point out that a recent study by the university of Bath suggests that stabilisers are not actually going to reduce the risk of a snake, just cover it up. Therefore you lose the first signs that something is wrong until it is too late. It would be more accurate to call them a comfort aid than a safety device.
There is even a train of thought that due to the early signs of a problem being covered up that they could be considered dangerous (I know at least one person on the forum that will not use a stabiliser who puts up a very good argument against them) Of course a more comfortable driver is more relaxed and should be a better driver which IMO cancels things out to a certain degree.
I certainly no longer consider a stabiliser a safety device, but whilst I am not about to remove mine, if I had the information when I bought it that I have now, I would have seriously considered saving my money and putting it towards retrofitting AlKos ATC which is certainly a far superior system as regards safety and is not significantly more expensive than a quality stabiliser.
As has already been mentioned, the Alko stabiliser is far better than the blase types.
Count me in as the Second Person that will not use a stabiliser.. I've had 2 new vans a 2006 Abbey and a 2007 Bailey both with Alko's on and as far as I am concerned they just mask the problem................. Load it correctly........... have the van level (or as near as) with the towing vehicle............ get your nose weight right ( and I don't mean by using the 7% rule) and you should have no problems
While loading and nose weight are major factors, they are not the only factors; road surface conditions, weather conditions and other traffic (HGV's/coaches overtaking) can also affect stability - the automatic answer will be "drive accordingly", but none of these items (especially other drivers!) are under your control....
Until stabilisers are demonstrably proven to be dangerous, I will continue to use one, as I have for over twenty years.
Gram
------------- What's the difference between a chicken?
The Straightliner actually does exert a force to push a wayward caravan back into line with the towing vehicle. I used one and it felt very stable indeed.
------------- Obsessed with German engineering - proud owner of a Hymer, a Mercedes, and a Radius recumbent bicycle.