Kerb Weight has two definitions. The old one is the basic operational unladen weight of the towing vehicle including a full tank of fuel. The new one, which most manufacturers are now following, follows European Directive 95/48/EC which specifies the kerb weight as a car in ready to drive condition with the fuel tank 90% full, a driver on board weighing 68 kg and luggage of 7 kg.
The advice for outfit matching is for the caravan to not exceed 85% of the towing vehicle kerbweight.
Question is, 'which kerbweight definition is this based upon?.
I have no idea! For towing I follow my own rule of thumb, I always have the kids on board ( big kids!) and a bootfull of gear so the cars kerbweight is significantly higher than empty, I'm towing at around 92% of the official kerbweight so I do tend to make sure the car is loaded with the heavy gear and my noseweight is slightly high (around 85kg)
I know that people will probably question the above, however it gives me a very stable tow, I have towed this van for over 5000m now without a wobble and at 65mph on french motorways most of the time.
The 85% thing is just a guideline to give you enough leeway in loading car & caravan without having to weigh everything. It matters nowt how the kerbweight is defined because the 85% don't have to be precise.
The driver is responsible for ensuring that the vehicle is in a safe and roadworthy condition. Exceeding an authoritive guideline, such as the CC 85% rule, could be construed, by the police or insurers, as rendering the vehicle unsafe or unroadworhthy, following an accident.
The present Towing Code defines kerbweight like the old UK C&U regs definition (empty, full fuel, no driver) but the revised Towing Code (no date for publication yet) will use the higher EC definition (empty, 90% fuel and 75kg for driver and miscellaneous). The difference between the two is about 70kg, depending on size of fuel tank.
For calculating 85% recommended, either definition can be used.
For calculating 100% legal maximum for B-only licence holders since 1/1/97, the higher EC definition is used as it's an EC restriction on licence holders.
Exceeding the 100% for B+E licence holders is NOT automatically illegal if the outfit is within ALL it's legal limits - prosecution would have to prove careless driving, or worse, not just exceeding 100%.
Exceeding 85% is NEVER an automatic offence - it's just a recommendation in the Towing Code for newcomers. The UK is one of the few countries which have an 85% recommendation - most other countries rely on legislative limits - 100% for B-only drivers and unlimited (vehicle limits still apply) for B+E drivers.
Exceeding 100% doesn't make any outfit illegal or unroadworthy as long as towing vehicle and trailer are within their respective Maximum Allowable Weights MAW or MTPLM and the total weight is within the towing vehicle's Gross Train Weight GTW.
Insurers CANNOT consider any outfit unacceptable if it's fully legal OR a specific clause is added to the policy, which they don't.
Quote: Originally posted by navver on 30/8/2009
Exceeding an authoritive guideline, such as the CC 85% rule, could be construed, by the police or insurers, as rendering the vehicle unsafe or unroadworhthy, following an accident.
That statement is incorrect, the 85% thing is just a recommendation by the the CC, while sensible it is not law. You can tow up to the manufacturer's stated towing limit of your vehicle & provided everything else is ok the vehicle would not be unsafe or unroadworthy, how could it be?
We tow at around 90%. Not ideal in some peoples eyes, but we have a well serviced 3 year old van, we load it sensibly, check the nose weight, tyres and lights every trip, and stay within legal speed limits.
We get there safely and get back!
------------- I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it left - Seasick Steve 2008
Quote: Originally posted by RogerL on 30/8/2009
For calculating 100% legal maximum for B-only licence holders since 1/1/97, the higher EC definition is used as it's an EC restriction on licence holders.
AFAICT, that's not true since the licensing regs use the terms "unladen weight" and not "kerbweight" and "unladen weight" doesn't include fuel or the driver.
The driver is responsible for ensuring that the vehicle is in a safe and roadworthy condition. Exceeding an authoritive guideline, such as the CC 85% rule, could be construed, by the police or insurers, as rendering the vehicle unsafe or unroadworhthy, following an accident.
The law states the maximum you can tow. This varies on your licence. The caravan club certanly do not make the law.
Provided you are within the law, how could you be constued as breaking it.
This is just scaremongering. I expect you also tell people that they are legally required to have a stabiliser too.
If your neighbour advised you not to tow over 60% would you take his word as law too?
What about if I told you that you shouldn't tow at all?
The Caravan Club are not an authoritive figure, they have merely offered this figure as a guideline for inexperienced towers. Even they highlight that it is a guideline and not a rule.
Many caravan manufactureres have a recommended noseweight that is higher than that of the tow car. It is common practice to get the noseweight as high as possible without over loading the car in these circumstances. Are you claiming this is illegal too?
as weights vary from vehicle to vehicle look on your v5c registration document. sect 4g will state a "mass in service" weight.
this is the true weight of your vehicle as it left the factory. use this weight to work out all other relevent weights in terms of %'s. that way there is no need to worry about what way you calculate kerbweight.
I appreciate that exceeding the 85% guideline is not illegal, however there is no written law that says you can't eat or drink (non alcoholic) whilst driving yet some people have been prosecuted for this. The police construed it was illegal by saying they have been driving without due care & attention.
I just wonder, if there were an accident, perhaps with someone hurt, they would similarly construe that the outfit was unsafe as an authoritative guideline has been broken and that the driver was at fault for not ensuring his outfit is safe. After all, how else are they going to define whether the outfit is safe.
They can't weigh anything if it's smashed in an accident. They can define an outfit is safe weight wise buy looking at the makers quoted weights of caravan & car. If the caravan is not to heavy for the car then its ok.
Do you seriously think anybody would stand up in court & say "The Caravan Club says you should only tow at 85% although the actual weight of car/caravan was legal therefore it wasn't legal even tho it actually was"?
Try Googling 'authoritive guideline' you will see the phrase refers to medical matters not motoring.
If a copper decides to nick you for eating & drinking at the wheel its 'not being in control of vehicle' or summat similar which would be true enough & not really arguable in court but I hardly think you could be accused of having an unsafe car/caravan just because the CC advise you to tow at 85%.
The courts can't enforce anything unless it is law which the 85% thing ain't.