Joined: 09/6/2008 Diamond Member
Forum Posts: 1567 Tent Reviews: 1
Site Reviews Total: | 24 |
|
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 1 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2018: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 2 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
Site Nights 2018: | 0 |
|
As no-one else has replied, I'll throw in my tuppence worth as a diesel SF owner (2005 model, old-shape, also towing 1500kg)...
Fuel consumption; depends on your definition of horrendous but I would have thought 'yes' would be the answer...my diesel averages about 24mpg when towing (at best I get 30mpg towing at 60mph on a flat motorway but down to 18mpg on a steep hill), so I would imagine the petrol version will be worse than that (20mpg at best, I would guess, probably less).
However, in all other respects, the SF is a good car and tows well. And you have to take account of the low purchase cost compared to most of the competition.
BUT, I would personally always go for a diesel if towing - not just the mpg but also the better torque figures. My SF is dog-slow when towing but I've pulled away on a steep slope with no drama and reversed the van up a hill (bloody sat-nav!) with no problems...
------------- 'In later life, you will be more disappointed with the things you didn't do than with the things you did.' - Mark Twain
|