Advertisement
Message Forums |
|
Topic: skoda superb estate 4x4 ( Topic Closed)
|
Page: 1 2 3
|
30/1/2012 at 4:10pm
Location: Blackburn Lancashire Outfit: Coachman Laser 650 and Discovery
View Profile
|
Joined: 06/2/2009 Diamond Member
Forum Posts: 2137
Site Reviews Total: | 0 |
|
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2018: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
Site Nights 2018: | 0 |
|
Do you know, this place is getting more like a Court of Law every day. We don't have to prove anything at all. If you want to push the boundaries, that's up to you. I prefer to be well within the guidleines.
The European Directive, as quoted by the Caravan Club, is not a third party website, so we can take that as law.
They don't believe the Skoda and the Ranger would be a good match, only "possible". At 97.5%, I wouldn't be keen.
You admit that a bigger towcar will provide a better match. Why not just do that? Why try to tow with the smallest possible car? I just don't see what advantage you gain.
You may not agree with decisions based on weight, but the CC do. Here's what they have to say:-
What does The Club recommend as a safe outfit/weight ratio for towing a caravan?
The principle must be to have the heaviest possible towcar for a given caravan, otherwise the chances of a swaying trailer becoming uncontrollable and snaking are very real. Aim for a towed load 85% of the car's kerb weight (KW), or the vehicle manufacturer's towing limit, if lower. The nearer the caravan laden weight approaches the one-to-one ratio, the more careful the driver must be. Remember that the towed weight is the actual laden weight (ALW) that the car is asked to pull (empty weight of caravan plus what you add), not the theoretical Maximum Authorised Weight (MAW) or (from 1999 production models) Maximum Technically Permissible Laden Mass (MTPLM).
We are often asked, ‘why 85%’, rather than 90% or 75%, say? The connection between weight ratio and stability has been proven through The Club’s own testing of cars and caravans, the wealth of member feedback we receive, and not least the scientific research we have sponsored. We picked 85% as the highest ratio we were comfortable using for universal recommendations, thus allowing the widest choice of compatible cars and caravans, while being confident that owners should find their outfit safe and comfortable to tow. We have, in fact, increased the ratio recommendation over the years, as car and caravan technology has improved, and more research has been carried out. When this advice was offered in the 1960s, the recommended maximum weight ratio was 70%. This increased to 80% in the 1970s, and to 85% in the 1980s. It is not likely that we will increase the recommendation further for the foreseeable future, though.
This does take into account the safety features you mention.
I've already said I would be OK with 5% on a twin axle, so you don't need to keep looking. The CC agree, but they prefer 7% where possible. It is possible, with a car having sufficient download allowance.
|
30/1/2012 at 5:48pm
Location: Outfit:
View Profile
|
Joined: 26/8/2008 Platinum Member
Forum Posts: 650
Site Reviews Total: | 5 |
|
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2018: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
Site Nights 2018: | 0 |
|
"The European Directive, as quoted by the Caravan Club, is not a third party website, so we can take that as law."
Oh goody!
"Commission Directive 95/48/EC of 20 September 1995 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 92/21/EEC relating to the masses and dimensions of motor vehicles of category M1"
"Angus, I'm sorry, but I'm not going to dedicate my weekend to proving what most of us know. Life's too short."
What we DO know is that:-
" 2.5. 'Maximum static vertical load on the coupling point` of the vehicle means the technically permissible vertical load transmitted, when the vehicle is stationary, by the drawbar of the trailer to the vehicle coupling and acting via the centre of the coupling device. This load must be specified by the manufacturer" This is taken from the directive
and:-
"3.3.2. The technically permissible static vertical load on the coupling device is that stated by the manufacturer; this load must be not less than 4 % of the maximum permissible towable mass and not less than 25 kg. "Again taken from the directive, which deals with the towing vehicle - no reference is made, suggested or insinuated to any trailer.
"The manufacturers' max tow has no legal standing," - Really? Despite it being a requirement of this regulation that the manufacturer MUST state "3.3.1. The technically permissible maximum towable mass in that stated by the manufacturer." Without that the vehicle would not have type approval as it is mandatory to provide this information in order to obtain type approval certification, without which you cannot use the vehicle legally anyway.
"I was only pointing out, with relevance to the CC leaflet I quoted, that there is a minimum noseweight, which is related to the MTPLM of the caravan."
Find me anything, anywhere in the EC Regulation which indicates this and I`ll buy you a pint
"Well Angus, I suggest that you review your thinking."
- Bit rude, but its what we have come to expect.
"The MTPLM is the legally recognised figure." Where? Not in this regulation, it isn`t even mentioned.
"The manufacturers' max tow has no legal standing,"- Well., as I`m on a roll I`ll go back to this one, it appears that the `manufacturer max tow` which I have already proven does have legal standing - isn`t a number plucked from thin air and has to meet certain criteria in order to qualify for Type Approval :-" 3.3.3. The motor vehicle towing a trailer must be able to start the vehicle combination - laden to its maximum mass - five times on an uphill gradient of at least 12 % within five minutes."
"His theory is that the European Directive (which I do accept is not written very clearly)" - Yes it is, it isn`t in the least ambiguous.
"His theory is that the European Directive (which I do accept is not written very clearly)" Now try reading and understanding.
As a self-proclaimed "expert" on everything, you are so utterly incorrect on so many levels it is embarrassing, particularly when coupled to your rudeness to others on here.
"We don't have to prove anything at all." Only that you aren`t talking garbage?
|
31/1/2012 at 1:39pm
Location: Outfit:
View Profile
|
Joined: 26/8/2008 Platinum Member
Forum Posts: 650
Site Reviews Total: | 5 |
|
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2018: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
Site Nights 2018: | 0 |
|
You know, this thread isn`t really that important to me. I wou have gladly disappeared back into the ether if it wasn`t for Greendemon315s arrogance and rudeness.
Typical scenario of the school bully trying to browbeat people into his way of thinking by way of insult backed up with………….. well, nowt really.
I`m highly amused that he thinks I am objectionable :-
"Well Angus, I suggest that you review your thinking.The legal minimum is 4% with a minimum of 25Kg for lighter trailers.Here's the reference. Surprised you haven't heard of it."
Nope haven`t heard of it as it doesn`t exist.
"I have read it on many occasions. The maximum is not the figure set by the car manufacturer, it is the maximum legal figure, which is the MTPLM of the van. That is the legally recognised figure.Jim"
Well, readings not much good if you don`t understand….
"Angus, I'm sorry, but I'm not going to dedicate my weekend to proving what most of us know. Life's too short"
Know what exactly? That you`re talking bullcrap?
"The manufacturers' max tow has no legal standing, and cannot be used for noseweight purposes. The MTPLM is the legally recognised figure."
Oops, wrong again, this is becoming embarrassing.
"I'm sorry you find my approach draconian, but I hear so much absolute nonsense on this forum"
That’s because you are listening to yourself
"As regards MTPLM, of course it's related to noseweight. The CC do accept that 7% is more difficult to attain these days, so let's look at the legal minimum, which is 4%, in spite of what Angus says"
Getting boring now…
"We don't have to prove anything at all."
No, but it helps if you don`t want to appear stupid
"Angus, you are being particularly offensive, and it isn't my job to educate you."
Don`t be daft , try a goldfish.
"His theory is that the European Directive (which I do accept is not written very clearly)"
Not if you can pass the 11+ it isn`t.,
I`m afraid I`m not intimidated by arrogant, condescending remarks, I prefer to let PROVABLE FACTS do my talking.
Anyway, I can assure you all this will be my last post on the subject.
Oh, just one more thing – I DID contact the Caravan Club, and it seems they, along with the rest of the planet (except 1) are totally wrong about the legislation as well:-
. Thank you for your e-mail.
There is no legal requirement for trailers. The only legal side is for the tow vehicle itself.
Regards
Kelly Henderson
Technical Advisor
For winter driving advice from the Highways Agency see here
Search for an Approved Workshop to find a nearby service and repair facility (now with customer satisfaction ratings)
From: ***** ***** [mailto:******.****** at ***.com]
Sent: 30 January 2012 09:59
To: Technical
Subject: Noseweight
Good Morning,
Could you please clarify the legal position on noseweight for me please?
I fully understand the `optimum` target of 7% of trailer weight, the requirement not to exceed the permissible hitch load etc, but is there a LEGAL reqirement to have a MINIMUM noseweight (percentage or weight) amount on a tow hitch when towing.
My reading of directive EC 95/48 is that the towing vehicle must have the capacity to carry a minimum of 4% of its plated towing limit on its tow hitch, but that this in no way imposes a minimum requirement on the hitch of the trailer being towed, and in no way relates to the MTPLM of any trailer.
Thanks in advance
***** *****
Membership No 0******x
JOB DONE
Post last edited on 31/01/2012 13:47:43
|
|
|
6230 Visitors online !
Free UKCampsite.co.uk Window Sticker - Recommend to Friend - Add a Missing Campsite
[Message Forums]
[Caravan Sites & Camping]
[Company Listings]
[Features / Advice]
[Virtual Brochure]
[Shop!]
[Reception]
[Competitions]
[Caravans & Motorhomes For Sale]
[Event Diary]
[Contact Us]
[Tent Reviews]
Please note we are not responsible for the content of external sites & any reviews represent the author's personal view only. Please report any error here. You may view our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions here. All copyrights & other intellectual property rights in the design and content of this web site are reserved to the UKCampsite.co.uk © 1999 - 2024
|
Advertisement
|
|
|