Message Forums

...........I know that the more obvious choice would be the Freelander 2 but I've been looking at the cars available at the moment and it appears that you jump between 1.5 and 2K just to have a freelander 2.  I know it's newer but I'm talking about cars that are barely a year apart.  I was wondering if all the niggles with the old style Freelander would have been likely to have been ironed out by the time they are 6 or 7 years old?  However, saying that, I am looking for a car that has done less miles than my current '57 Mondeo (80K).  So if I am looking at a lower mileage car would these problems have had time to occur?  My head is hurting with it all.  My heart says "go for the Freelander 2" but my head says "try to save some money".  Any advice?

Thanks

Alison

Freelander 2 without doubt, even if a bit more to purchase you may find over all costs less on the 2, and better residual value.  Only go for diesel, and check service history.

Regards

Norman

I had a Freelander and wish I still had it, it was a far better vehicle than the Japanese rubbish I persuaded to buy by OH last year.

Whichever you chose you will have a great tow car.