I tend to get the feeling that on many campsites there is a 'class system'. Tents get the field furthest away from the amenities whilst caravans with EHU get the pitches closest to the facilities.
If you think about that it's actually the wrong way round since it's usually tents that don't have their own facilities and ought to be closest. This just goes to show that caravanners who can afford the more expensive pitches also get to be closest to the amenities whether they need them or not...and it's the 'class' and not the logical requirement that does the talking.
Having said that, the site I was on this last weekend seemed to get it about right. It was a site on the River Thames and the fully serviced caravan pitches were closest to the river with the better views but furthest away from the facilities. The EHU pitches were behind them but on a raised level which also gave them a reasonable view of the river, be it over or between the caravans in front. The tents were furthest from the river with little view but closest to the facilities. I don't think they had EHU either.
I was initially booked in on the tent pitches because I said I didn't need EHU, but when I arrived and pointed out that I was in a caravan and not a tent they gave me an EHU pitch on the second row (like being at the theatre) but only charged me the non-EHU (tent) rate, which I thought was reasonable. I wondered if I had a tent and insisted on being in the front row even though I didn't want the fully serviced bit they would have given me a pitch there at the tent rate...possibly not.
|