Joined: 29/3/2007 Silver Member
Forum Posts: 157 Tent Reviews: 2
Site Reviews Total: | 5 |
|
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2018: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
Site Nights 2018: | 0 |
|
Hi everybody, I'm still fairly new to tent camping after 30 years ago tin-tenting on family holidays as a kid. At the beginning of this year, I made a concerted effort to finally do it. Ideally I wanted a big family tent to suit my OH, the 2 kids and I, but due to budget restraints, and pack size for biking, I went for the Oregon 5. It suits our needs as a weekender tent, but I really wanted to go for the Vermont XL for the longer stays.
The question now is, does the Vermont XL class as a large tent? I've seen several posts concerning large tents getting charged double pitch fees, but is that because they're domes with side pods, or wide tunnels? What is the standard pitch size for the average site? What seems to be the maximum footprint of a tent before it's classed as a large requiring 2 pitches?
What I don't want to do is shell out for the perfect tent, and have to pay double in pitch fees for the privilege. The Vermont XL is the one I want, and at 4.8 by 7.7m doesn't seem to be excessive if you consider the 6m firebreak pitch gap.
Has anybody else had problems with the Vermont, or am I worrying over nothing here?
Thanks in advance,
Iain
|