Joined: 20/5/2004 Diamond Member
Forum Posts: 6449 Tent Reviews: 4
Site Reviews Total: | 16 |
|
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2018: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
Site Nights 2018: | 0 |
|
Hi. Went and had a look at a couple of camping exhibitions yesterday in quite testing wet'n' windy weather.
We noticed that the central domes of the Idaho and Utah are not supported by the normal poling arrangement of two full length poles which cross over the middle of the dome through some sort of pole sleeve and ring and pin at the bottom of the fly. Rather, they both have short length poles which are only the length of the roof of the dome, push into little pockets where the fly starts to form a vertical wall dropping down from the roof of the dome and are held in place against the middle of the dome by velcro. In other words, they only cross the roof and do not gain any tension or strength from going the full distance across the whole fly from ground level to ground level.
Does that make sense? Anyway, the Utah in particular seemed to be blowing about quite a lot yesterday and I was wondering how these two tents had performed in the poor weather conditions this summer. Were these short roof poles sufficient to maintain tension across the tent or might traditional full length poles have been a a benefit? MT
------------- Tackling life the Western District way
|