Joined: 19/6/2004 Diamond Member
Forum Posts: 14547 Tent Reviews: 2
Site Reviews Total: | 3 |
|
Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2019: | 0 |
Site Reviews 2018: | 0 |
|
Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
Site Nights 2019: | 0 |
Site Nights 2018: | 0 |
|
I've got an Oregon 800, 600 and 400 so you could say I'm biased, lol. Two are the oldr riser groundsheet model, the 400 has a SIG, which is a bit of a departure for me, lol!
Anyway, why did I just keep cloning Oregons? The shape suits me, I can pitch any of them blindfold, our canopy fits them all, they're good sturdy tents in a classic shape, I like them.
Cons? Well, I got them all at what I consider good prices but they're certainly more expensive now. I think though you shouldn't compare the Oregon with the Icarus, more to the current long tunnel model that Vango is putting out, the Tigris, which is about £230-ish atm for the 600.
Why is the Icarus so cheap? Well, one theory. Vango always seem to have one real bargain though as a weekender/short stay lent, to lure both new and established campers over to the Vango side. Used to be the Vango Venture 500, this year it's the Icarus. People do tent to carry on buying the same tent brand once they are happy. Straightforwards, no frills design, produced in huge quantities, sold as a loss leader?
|