Message Forums

That is what I am looking at - I am quite impressed with it.  Our children are 10 and 5.  I know that the 10 year old will want his own space soon but he has his own little pup tent

We have the Montana 6P with both Front Awning (6P) and Front Extension (6P). The Montana 6P (to me) looks more attractive than the Montana 6 (plus you might have a job to find all the optional extras for it now). Granted in the Montana 6P you don’t get as much space in the Awning/Extension as last year’s models.

We get the Outwell Richmond Kitchen on one side of the Awning but you would be hard pressed to get a table there as well so you end up using the other side (http://www.ukcampsite.co.uk/tents/userimages/9883.jpg). As for the extension, you get table and chairs under it, but not much else.

Quote: Originally posted by peteuk123 on 03/9/2012

---

the awning does look better, but we were looking at the open extension due to cost to be honest

---

The open Extension worked better on the Montana 6 or Montana 6 Deluxe (2012 Mocha) then it does on the 6P due to the front. Most people in general if they only get one, seem to go for the Awning as it can be closed up or opened up.

As I have said before, we only got the Extension as we won’t always take awning, and it’s nice to have a choice. One thing however you will need to take it down in very windy conditions.

Quote: Originally posted by mcguire6078 on 03/9/2012In my personal opinion more hype than any practical difference. Unless the fabric is heavier/thicker IE 100 Denier (Kampa tents) to 75 Denier (Outwell). As the fabric is heavier it would be more resistant to UV degradation

---

---