Message Forums

Hi there Donna

            We have a 2006 Ranger 500/5 and have had it for bout a year now. Its a nice van and your son will have plenty of space to sleep etc at the back of the van. I would not recommend it as a double bed for two fairly built people.Also to be honest the bathroom is on the small side. We use the site showers all the time so its not a problem if you do too.

             That all sounds a bit negative i know, but its not a bad van at all. The rear of the van in the day is a nice space to sit and eat or read or just chill. All in all its a nice spacious van as my parents who both struggle to get about these days only go in the van when we take them and we all have no problem space wise though as i said earlier the bedroom at the back is best for one ( especially being the size i am!) and i usually end up in the awning at night while mum dad and the oh sleep in the van.

Thanks Marshy,i did notice the shower/loo bit was small but we always use the sites facilities and only use the loo at night for spending a penny lol,so thats not a problem,i really like the layout of the van as like i said it gives my son a bit of space of his own plus having extra seating in the day is good,and when he does decide he dosnt want to come anymore it still willbe a good size for OH and me and the dogs.

At the moment we all play musical beds and take turns of one in the awning,but if its really cold we all have to come inside and look like three blue caterpillars all in sleeping bags in a row up on the opened seating/bed area in our 2 berth lol thank goodness it a massive bed,but its definatley getting cramped.

we have the 500/5 and love it.our grandson has the double bed all to himself but he is only 6 years old.his mum has slept in it and she is about 5' 8in.

Quote: Originally posted by murano on 22/3/2010

---

Thanks Michael,i think this is going to be the van for us,not to heavy good layout and in our budget.Now the search begins :)

---

We had a 1999 Ranger 510/4, with the side dinette and end washroom. The 500/5 will be much better for you as most bunk type arrangements are really only suitable for children. The downside for you is the kitchen and bathroom will be more cramped. We had a lot more kitchen workspace.

The Ranger was a very good van, Light to tow, well equipped, cheap to buy and very easy to live in. The only thing I can't understand is; they don't put spark ignition on the otherwise beautiful cooker.

Quote: Originally posted by navver on 22/3/2010

---

We had a 1999 Ranger 510/4, with the side dinette and end washroom. The 500/5 will be much better for you as most bunk type arrangements are really only suitable for children. The downside for you is the kitchen and bathroom will be more cramped. We had a lot more kitchen workspace.

The Ranger was a very good van, Light to tow, well equipped, cheap to buy and very easy to live in. The only thing I can't understand is; they don't put spark ignition on the otherwise beautiful cooker.

---

fully agree

 they don't put spark ignition on the otherwise beautiful cooker.

I emailed Bailey before we bought our new van and they offered to add it for £88. but in the end we bought ans ex display so no spark ignition. It is a real pain because my wife has an arthritic hip and getting down to light the oven is really difficult. Quite why they still persevere with this silly penny pinching ommision beats me. Even the GT60 we've just bought has a radio & microwave etc but no spark ignition.

But otherwise very good vans and it didin't put us off.

Only thing I would say, is that I understand there was an issue with the front panel on some Bailey's circa 2005'ish (Michael might know series), consequently there was an issue with water ingress due to cracking panels.
Just be aware when your on the hunt.

yes correct, 2005 to early 2006 had a cracking panel problem giving water ingress.the cracks were mainly where the front panel joins the roof.possibly two to three inch long to look at.so beware as said.odd ones had a crack at the rear too.