A quick note for everyone who has posted asking about this van lately
we went to see one today .......
So disappointed ,i know its cheap(ish ) But the quality was dire !!!! There were a few vans for around the same price that were head and shoulders above the bailey in the quality stakes ,only they were a little heavier ,so if weight isnt your main issue ,then I wouldnt bother with the Orion :[
Quote: Originally posted by skiTTish on 21/6/2011
A quick note for everyone who has posted asking about this van lately
we went to see one today .......
So disappointed ,i know its cheap(ish ) But the quality was dire !!!! There were a few vans for around the same price that were head and shoulders above the bailey in the quality stakes ,only they were a little heavier ,so if weight isnt your main issue ,then I wouldnt bother with the Orion :[
I'm a Bailey fan, but from what I've seen of the Orions, I wouldn't be keen.
Oh no, I liked the look of that one, it looks just what we want in the brochure,the layout is what we have been looking for and with a lowish weight. Yet to see one in the 'flesh'
Interestingly when I went to look at Orion, I also compared it to Sprite Alpine 4 in the same showroom, which is similar in weight and felt that the finish on Sprite was dire in comparison.
Although the edgings of the furnishings are thin for lightness I thought that it appeared well made- certainly doesn't have same flaws I have seen on delivered vans from Swift where wardrobe doors are warped quite badly and Swift advise that this is acceptable and although not quite on level of my Adria that I owned previously the Orion seems really cosy and well built. I don't have children or pets though so not sure whether 'family life' would take its toll?
Quote: Originally posted by the polarbear on 21/6/2011
Interestingly when I went to look at Orion, I also compared it to Sprite Alpine 4 in the same showroom, which is similar in weight and felt that the finish on Sprite was dire in comparison.
We did the same, the Sprite seemed a lot darker/cheaper looking than the Orion. I thought the Orion was fantastic, obviously the more luxurious (and therefore more expensive) vans had more bells and whistles, but for the price we didn't see anything that matched the Orion for value.
I agree completely the Orion looks flash but look closely and look at other vans :(
Those stupidly large rounded edging things inside are loose and you can see underneath to the nuts and bolts of the van and the huge gap between panels . Open any door or locker and the handle will cause damage to surrounding finishes . There are small gaps between the seals of the shower doors that will allow water into the rest of the van and the shower is poorly sealed . Also there is visible use of silicone sealant everywhere ,just nasty . The blinds open and close very poorly and the handles are flimsy ,same with the handles on the windows . The skylights are very flimsy .
All of the above would only be apparent to someone with a few years of caravanning use and scrutiny under their belt so I really believe as this van is aimed at newbies ,Bailey think the faults will slip past them :(
I think I was expecting something on a par with the Ranger ( also entry level van ) But our Ranger is far better quality :( So disappointed :( I went there wanting to like it ,having loved it online ,it looked perfect for us but alas even the salesman couldnt argue with how crap it was :(
Have to say we didnt like the Orion either - and believe me I really wanted to! We have length issues () because of the access to our garden, so my dream of a fixed bed/end bathroom is unlikely to come true because most models are too long. Not so the Orion. But even taking that into account, there were so many little niggles we didnt like about the van that it would still have been a compromise for us.
Trying to persuade OH he didnt need a front locker (its the equivalent of his shed on holiday!), the shelf directly over the sink in the bathroom was the only storage, the fact that OH had to stand in the shower cubicle to bend over the bathroom sink and cracked his head on said shelf (!), the tiny kitchen, the three ring hob (would you get three pans on there at once?) general lack of storage throughout. OK I know its a small van and what do I expect, but the finish wasnt great either and It just wasnt for us sadly.
I went to see the orion 400 the little 2 berth with end bathroom ,OH liked it ,but lack of a front locker was a real no no for me .i can not understand the logic of designing a small caravan with no front locker.Or am I missing something if it was a tiny bit longer with a front locker I am sure it would appeal to more people.
I quite liked it on first impressions, but didn't exam it with a fine toothed comb, as we are not looking to change at the mo..Only time will tell, when someone actually buys one and uses it i guess...
Very interesting post. It has totally changed my mind in buying one. I can see the faults and issues raised as lack of attention to detail. I will now keep my convertible conway platinum crusader and enjoy it more knowing that i have not missed out on buying this van.
Ive been in one and hated it, I understand the concept but it's just horrible , and as for the outside it looks like a loaf of bread on wheels.
Nope definatley dosnt rock my socks at all.
------------- "I'm a fool for my dogs"
Adopt a rescue, rescue dogs make great pets, don't support puppy farms.
The road can be tough and rough,but what you put in you get back 10 x more.
Quote: Originally posted by skiTTish on 21/6/2011
When will a manufacturer work out that a lightweight 'good/reasonable ' quality van would sell like hotcakes ?? :/
I'm guessing UK manufacturers have done their market research & have found they wouldn't(sell like hotcakes). If you want a lightweight low spec 'van you need to look at foreign makes like Caravelair.
The logic of designing a small caravan with no front locker & storing gas bottles amidships would be to allow 'van to be towed by smaller cars with low towbar download limit.
I'm certainly no expert as I'm new to caravanning, but having spent about 2 hours at my local dealers yesterday I would have said the Orion was pretty ok quality wise. The Swifts, Sprites and an Eccles' I saw (that were all £1-£7k more) had some really cheap plastics and very poor finishing/execution. Even compared to my 16 yr old Golden Crown.
The big issue I had was kicking the fridge door when leaning over as if washing up.
There's just some really daft things in some vans, as if the desigers haven't actually testing their designs on real humans.
Agree on the loaf of bread on wheels, very quirky odd design that I'm really not sure of.
As I have said elsewhere, one of the problems we find with the van is the width (or rather lack of it). The layout we prefer is the one similar to the 430/4, with the end washroom and side fixed bed.. It makes the passage past the fixed bed, on the way to the washroom noticably narrower IMHO. The 4" less in with in the Orion (over the Pegasus, Unicorn and earlier Pageant S7) comes off the floor space and is no good for us.
Another thing that I'm not keen on in the 430/4 and the 440/4 is that when the door opens it obstructs part of the side window. On each of the models the side window at the front of the van is positioned over the roof curve, which means for the 430/4 and 440/4 fitting a porch awning is impossible without it coming down accross a window. This may not be an issue for everyone, but just something that others might consider important.
I can't really comment on the build quality and don't suppose that I will look at the van any further other than out of curiosity. Not sure if I would miss the 'traditional' gas fire but I reckon I'd miss the front locker. Just my opinion - I'm sure many will find the van very suitable for their needs.