Quote: Originally posted by welford on 13/3/2010
Wouldnt you have thought that Baily as a gesture of goodwill would replace the caravan from stock and take the problem caravan back. They could then inspect carefully what is and has going on whilst on the production line and then through quality control and finally purchase and use. If there are lessons to be learnt from any design or workmanship faults best find out now before there are to many more unhappy customers.
exactly !! instead of intending to rip our van to bits to find out what went wrong...then give us it back !!!!
<FONT color=#0000ff><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"> With regard to the paint “respray” <SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: blue; FONT-STYLE: italic; FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'">there will be times when minor damage is sustained during production. Quite naturally this will be reworked to the required final finish standard and the unit subsequently inspected and released</SPAN>
If you can see the repair then it has not been done to a required finish standard full stop!
I'd like to see you print out a list here of the 34 faults you have found - might get others looking as well
I really think that this is one of those stories that BBC's "Watchdog" would like to get hold of.
I wouldn't say it is just Bailey but it seems that everyone buying a new van has to gamble their money on whether they are going to get a mobile holiday home or a lemon
Discounted Insurance Quotes for UKCampsite.co.uk visitors! Up to 12.5% off!
I've been following this thread with interest as we were considering a new van next year.
I'm sorry to hear about the problems you have had but you say that some of the problems are trivial, it does not matter how trivial they are, a defect is a defect no matter how small and no matter what has been purchased new. New means exactly that, it has never been used, it is fresh from the production line and should be completely fault and defect free.
In the case of a caravan then minor faults such as a cracked light fitting could be dealt with by the dealer as this makes financial sense, however anything which warrants the purchase to be returned to the original manufacturer should be regarded as 'not fit for purpose' as it cannot be used safely or without causing further damage to the purchase during normal use. In your case the original crack in the shower area.
Concentrate on the major faults for a refund or complete replacement and use the minor defects as additional ammunition towards your case.
On a slightly different note, I think it would be useful to have a list of common faults to look for when purchasing a van either new or used together with a list of useful legal organisations and contact numbers for the various manufacturers. Maybe a new page or at the very least a Sticky Thread that can be added to by members.
well . after much debate at the dealers the van is going back to Bailey for inspection then a decision will be made from there.Met the MD of the dealership who came in especially to see us and made it clear that before a refund or replacement can be given the go ahead , they must at least look closely at the van. He agreed there were major faults ,particularly the repaired area on the panel under kitchen window that appears to have disturbed the inner wall as well , that is bowed over the worktop and is of extreme concern.
Reading between the lines this van wont be repairable , theres too much to be done and i believe at some point we will be offered a replacement or refund.
Just thave to sit tight now for a couple of weeks ands see what the outcome is...
Well i really hope they sort this out for you.
I still think that the dealer is hiding behind Bailey as your contract of sale is with THE DEALER and the dealer ONLY. The fact you are still without the use of a van suggest to me that the dealer really are not looking after you but Themselves by not offering the refund NOW.
What they are looking for is to get there money back of bailey and then offer it to you, that way they don't loose anything and you the customer loose your use of the van, loose sleep, loose money, etc. i really find the way you are being treated appalling.
While you wait for their decision get in touch with trading standards and get the ball rolling. www.consumerdirect.gov.uk will help with templet letters. Really, you don't want to stand still while they decide get the ball rolling now just in case its bad news.
"What they are looking for is to get there money back of bailey and then offer it to you, that way they don't loose anything and you the customer loose your use of the van, loose sleep, loose money, etc. i really find the way you are being treated appalling"
Agree. Might be of assistance to you, if you have not made it clear already, to write to the Dealer to say that their decision to return the Van to Bailey's for its inspection and views are entirely without prejudice to your rights, in law, to have a refund. In that way it is clear that you are not accepting that Baileys decision is binding, in the event that it says that the problem can be remedied.
Phil
------------- If you're not on a fell your wasting your feet and for 2014 it's.......Feb Castleton Mar North Yors Moors; Apr Sutton on Sea; May Thirsk; Jun Clapham/Riverside (Lakes); July Wharfedale; August Crakehall; Sept Knaresborough; Oct Wirral Park/Clitheroe
im fairly confident we will get either a replacement van or a refund (preferably), we just have to go through this system of the van being checked out down at the factory first.Theres no way they can make good the panel damage without it being noticeable, they couldnt get it right to start with , the only way is a whole new side on it and i cant see that happening, along with a new rear panel and the many other jobs that need doing. Is it worth Bailey running the risk of doing all that work just for it to be rejected again by us because summat aint right ?
however we arent taking anything for granted and will review the matter as and when Bailey or the dealer contact us with a decision as to the next move.
thanks again for all your help , brilliant, all of you
Fair enough and they do need to inspect it to be reasonable, however I do think they should offer you either a loan van or some compensation for the time you are without it.
Probably a bit late now as you have agreed to a further inspection, but, Hang on - the MD acknowledges that there are faults, therefore the dealership failed in their duty to ensure that the van was fit for sale.
You do not have to wait for the manufacturer to provide a report - the problem lies with the dealership. It is up to the dealership to take the hit of a refund or replacement and it is up to the dealership to deal with the manufacturer.
Get legal aid as suggested earlier and hit them hard now, don't wait and don't warn them, just do it now.
I think things look as though they are moving now Bev and John. The dealers are probably on your side as ours were when we were having problems with our Swift.Bailey are the ones who have to answer to poor workmanship and quality. It is their good name they have to uphold.Now they are having it back to look at it they are obviously now taking your concerns seriously.After our experience we feel that all caravan manufactureres have to accept more responsibility for the odd van or two which slips through the net and has too many faults.They too often hide behind the dealerships.
Come on Bailey!! Stand up and be counted. Your new range is very appealing , so don't put off potential purchasers with bad aftersales support.
It still does not hide the fact that the dealership is responsible for ensuring that the van is 100% ready for sale.
When you buy a van your contract is with the dealer, the dealers contract is with the manufacturer and the manufacturers contracts are with their parts suppliers etc etc etc.
Of course the dealer will seem to be helpful - they are using you to keep their finances in the black by fobbing you off and passing you to the manufacturer.
If you bought a leg of lamb and you found it had gone off when you got home, would you demand a replacement or refund from the butcher or wait until the butcher got in touch with the farmer?
The principle is exactly the same!
I'm sorry to rant but it really annoys me when I see good people being taken advantage of.
It's fine saying the caravan shouldn't go back to the factory to be rectified, surely if its got as many major faults as are being claimed, it'll be better to go through the proper facility to be repaired than go through a dealers workshop to have the work done.
The reason I'm saying this is simple. The build process of the Pegasus is 100% different than any dealers workshop has had to deal with in the past. IF it has to have a new back panel, it'll have to have a new roof & front panel as well as the whole thing is, I believe, one piece!!
I have the greatest of respect for our dealer & I know they are very capable indeed of carrying out some serious levels of repairs to caravans, but if I had one of these new build process models with a list of problems as long as your leg, I'd be pleased it was going back to the factory to be sorted out.
Every manufacturer of any type of product is going to have a bad one now & then, we've had rogue lorries over the years that have had serious problems but it's only a very minute percentage of the production numbers & at least this seems to be being addressed. Let's hoe we start to read good results from all the inspections this Pegasus has to undergo when it comes back to the factory. If it's visit is anything like our friends Senator had, it'll be returned to Bev as new.
I believe the roof and front panel are one piece but the back panel is seperate. I have to agree with Knightwarrior here, and I speak with personal experience. The contract is with the dealer. Bailey have no interest whatsoever in whether the buyer gets a refund or not. They will, if anything, repair the van or replace it. It looks like the buyer is now set on a refund and that will be down to the dealer.
There are many issues to consider when making a decision as to the route you will take to resolve a problem. Just a cautionary note for anyone involved in such scenarios...........have a good view upon the financial stability of the seller. If your seller were to go into administration or start winding up procedures whilst you are waiting then you simply go on to the list of unsecured creditors. You still have your manufacturers warranty but that is for getting the item repaired rather than replaced or your money back. If you used your credit card in part or whole payment there is always the option of getting your money back from the credit card company and let it become an unsecured creditor rather than you. Something to think about
------------- If you're not on a fell your wasting your feet and for 2014 it's.......Feb Castleton Mar North Yors Moors; Apr Sutton on Sea; May Thirsk; Jun Clapham/Riverside (Lakes); July Wharfedale; August Crakehall; Sept Knaresborough; Oct Wirral Park/Clitheroe
Also a point of note, if you have used credit of ANY type to purchase any amount toward the van, this also makes the creditor responsible for the faulty van and if you also write to the creditors they will get involved big time. I had a faulty sofa on credit and the internal frame collapsed, a repair was offered but a asked for a refund. as soon as the creditors got involved i was refunded.