We have sold the 11 year old Bessacarr motorhome and have bought a new Lunar 560 caravan, after towing our car behind the van to Spain this year (£800 fuel) plus cost of keeping it on the road we have gone back to caravanning.
Family all grown up and this is a van for us, next year we tour the lakes and Scotland somewhere we have never been, cant wait to give it a try, had the van delivered to our home address yesterday.
Just have to fine some sites for next year to get them booked.
I could never see the logic of towing a car behind a motorhome. Always seemed more logical to tow a caravan behind the car. You get much more for your money and there is only one vehicle to tax and MOT.
While I can see the benefits of a motorhome over a caravan and also the benefits of a caravan over a motorhome, towing a car behind a motorhome just seemed to be the worst of both worlds and that's before you start considering the legality of towing the car behind the motorhome which is a whole can of worms of its own.
Discounted Insurance Quotes for UKCampsite.co.uk visitors! Up to 12.5% off!
I did the same. The only drawback I find is that I tend not to go away for just a weekend or a few nights with the caravan as it seems I just got there and it's time to hitch up again! Whereas with my diddy romahome demountable I went away for weekends and such.
I needed to keep a car as well as the camper, so now I just have a car to tax for 12 months, not both. Another bonus (and main reason for selling the camper) is that I can stand up in the caravan, which helps my back a great deal!
Glad to see you have joined the 'Back to the Caravan Club' too.
We did the same and have met more than few people who spent a lot of money buying a MH only to find that 'Living the Dream' was not quite what they thought it would be.
I was interested to read this as we are debating whether to go from Motorhome to caravan. We thought the convenience of having one vehicle would be great, but are thinking that we would probably pop out from site more on a whim in the evenings or after maybe when the walls begin to close in on a wet day. Be interested to hear everyones pros and cons of both please.
Quote: Originally posted by DaveCoaches on 02/10/2011
I could never see the logic of towing a car behind a motorhome. Always seemed more logical to tow a caravan behind the car. You get much more for your money and there is only one vehicle to tax and MOT.
A large caravan requires a large 4x4 to tow it. Once the caravan is on site you then have to drive that large 4x4 around narrow roads & try to park in narrow town streets in the area in which you are spending time.
So towing a small car on a trailer behind a large motorhome in those circumstances in fact is more logical. One does assume that for anybody sufficiently funded to own any of the equipment as described & to take extended holidays in Europe the cost of either would not be an issue.
The motorhome/car outfit also allows you to stop on campingcar aires in France which do not allow caravans & it is also easier to stop en route for lunch etc in a motorhome.
I don't know much about camping car aires but ordinary aires allow caravans. When a motorhome tows a car you are transporting 2 engines and transmissions etc. and there is less space than in a similar sized caravan.
Quote: Originally posted by brianconwy on 04/10/2011
I don't know much about camping car aires but ordinary aires allow caravans. When a motorhome tows a car you are transporting 2 engines and transmissions etc. and there is less space than in a similar sized caravan.
There are plusses and minuses to both.
'Aire' just means place or area in French. Autoroute aires, ie motorway services should not be confused with 'aire de service campingcar' Which is a motorhome parking area provided in towns etc with service facilities, usually coin in slot. If you stop on one of these with a caravan you can get moved on &/or fined.
A big part of the motorhome experience in France is to be able to stop at aires de campingcar. If you want to do that then you need a motorhome. However if you also want to stop on remote campsites then you need a car & a small car like a Smart is ideal for negotiating narrow country lanes in remote rural France.
We'll probably go back to a VERY small caravan once our Bongo packs in. Not because we want to. For us, a campervan was definitely the best option of all the units we have had. But because we can't afford a newish campervan a caravan it will have to be boohoo.
It depends what sort of holidays/travelling you like. If you want to travel from place to place, not staying very long in each, a motorhome would probably be more convenient, especially as it gives the option of free camping, but if you prefer to stay on a site for more than a few days a caravan is better. If I won the lottery I'd have both!
------------- Il vaut mieux vivre ses reves que rever sa vie
I think you have summed it up nicely there iwalani. When we retire and there are just the two of us then a motorhome might be the way we will go. We will have the time to get our moneysworth out of it then.
Interesting viewpoints and obviously what suits some doesn't suit others. Our preference is for a van for all the reasons already stated. However, as age and arthritus catches up, as it does, we had a serious look at campers. It was an interesting exercise but the conclusion was, not for us. Couldn't justify running two vehicles so would have to be small enough to use as every day transport and after just two of us in a Senator it just wouldn't work, especially going back to making up the bed. Elected to modify the van slightly to accomadate disabilities.Hopefully be able to use the van for another couple of seasons...............Mick